• Twitter
  • Facebook
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Tailing the Komets

Talking to coach

This is going to run tomorrow.

Komets coach Pat Bingham has been on the job for three weeks and
he's spent most of that on the phone, talking to players from last year and
potential players. The News-Sentinel talked with Bingham about his plans and
hopes for the team.

Blake Sebring: All the players I talk to seem to be very excited
after talking to you.

Pat Bingham: With the turning over of a new leaf here,
opportunity does present itself and that's always exciting for players. It's
great to hear that guys are excited about signing and coming back with great
attitudes and energy. In turn that gets me excited. Maybe they've enjoyed our
talks on the telephone. I've encouraged them to look into my background and
talk to others who have played for me because that's the best recruiting tool I

BS: How are you going about putting together a team?

PB: Is there an exact science? You make your calls. You just have
to be very diligent. We're in the business of people so you have to use your
network of people you are familiar with and try to get a cross section of
references on guys. You can't overspend, but the key component is the quality
of person. Talent is obviously a major component but the keys are character and
desire and what are they playing for? We're hearing all the right answers so

BS: What are you doing to find some toughness?

PB:: To me I define toughness different than somebody else might.
It's a mental approach and a will, having a stronger will than their opponents.
Sometimes that means fighting and sometimes it means taking a cheap shot an not
responding such as going to the scoring area and taking a beating to score a
goal. Again, it comes back to the kind of guys we're going after, strong-willed
guys who want to play a team-first concept. If we do our homework and get the
right type of guys, I think we'll be a tough team to play against.

BS: But what is your feeling about fighters?

PB: We're looking at everybody. We're out there trying to round
out a hockey club. We want every element and component so we can compete with
anybody. Ideally, you want to put together a team that is skilled enough to
skate with the skill teams and also have that element of toughness and
character and girt that you can beat those types of teams, too. When you have
enough, that sometimes it results in fights and sometimes in not retaliating.
There are a lot more times in a game when it's not the right time and you have
to walk away. We want to be tough enough to play with those teams that play
with that element. We're trying to strike a balance and leave no stone

BS: How about having the players help with recruiting?

PG: We're trying to strike a balance and leaving no stone
unturned. Who knows better than the players who they would want to play with
and not against? They know the guys they hate playing against, and usually
those are the kind of guys you'd like on your team. I always ask players about
that and often I end up hearing the same names and we check those players out.

BS: How many rookies are you looking to sign?

PB: I think we want to have an extremely competitive camp. We
intend to make people earn their jobs. I believe in competition within a team and
within an organization is crucial to your success. We won't grossly
over-recruit our team. You have to play four every night, and maybe more than
four make the team. That kind competition is healthy. If I was a general
manager of a pro sports team I'd always be after the best player available, and
I wouldn't care if they were rookies or not..

BS: What about affiliations with American Hockey League teams?

PB: I look at it this way: The league is going through a
transformation right now. It has lost some teams, and I think 10 teams is a
great number right now. The rivalries are going to be very intense because
we're going to see each other multiple times and you are looking for every edge
you can get. The affiliations come into play here in getting the younger guys
at the lower salaries. I think it's important because of the cap that is now
going to be very closely monitored. I think that you go out and get your
veterans, guys who have played at the higher levels before who are looking to
settle down. Then you've got your four rookies, and then there's the guys in
between. You can't make everybody rich because you can't exceed the cap. So I
say give the money to the older guys, the mainstays, the pillars in the locker
room. They aren't going anywhere. In order for the young players to be
motivated because they aren't making the most money, they have to have
something else, too, and maybe that's looking for a chance to move up. If they
want to further their careers, we have to open our doors wide open. You can
strike a balance of older and young guys who want to see how far they can take
it. If anything it creates a lot of excitement in that locker room.

BS: But what about the chance of getting burned by AHL teams
taking your best players, possibly for the season?

PB: When guys are making top dollar, it's like a player wanting
to have his cake and eat it too. I don't think a player should negotiate for
top dollar and then want to go up during the year. If you are wanting to go to
the AHL, you shouldn't be looking for the big money here because that's at the
next level for you. You can have an opportunity but take a little less money to
fit into the salary cap and the structure of this team. The individual will be
rewarded. I am a proponent of it. I think the league would be wise to start
going into this direction a little bit. It's going to enable us to get the best
rookies if they see a light at the end of the tunnel.

We're allowed to have seven veterans in our league, and those are
seven guys who aren't going anywhere. They have no desire to go anywhere, they
want to win a title here. There are going to be first-year guys who want to cut
their teeth and maybe go to the AHL, and then there are going to be half a
dozen guys or so who are hungry and looking to see how far they can go.

  Wayne is such a great place to play, but we don't want
it to just be a great place for the old dogs to go to pasture. We want to have
the best young guys coming in the league because there is great opportunity.
It's a work in progress. It's just like any championship team at any level, you
have a great blend of older and younger.

I work for the Frankes and the Komets first and foremost. It's my
job to make sure the team we're putting together is going to be intact for the
most part of the entire season, but when you lose a player for a weekend to the
AHL, there's a buzz in the room and it provides somebody an opportunity to step
up and play a larger role. It's all about opportunities. I now it stings when
they take your best ones, but again that's why we're talking about prioritizing
the older key veteran guys and then sprinkling the lineup with some younger
guys. We'll still be fine if those guys get called up.

BS: What are your thoughts about trying to get a player/assistant

PB: I've had one before, and if the right guy comes along I would
be open to it. It's definitely something that's on our minds.

BS: Does the salary of a player-assistant still count against the
salary cap?

PB: Their entire salary goes against the cap.

BS: How about players the Komets acquired in the dispersal draft?

PB: We've got the rights to several players form last year's
roster as well as guys that we claimed or drafted, and we've talked to nearly
all of them. We're going through the process here of due diligence and
character references before we sign players and going down that road too far.
We're looking at character issues, the quality of the person that we're talking
about and how they get along on the team which is perhaps the greatest team game
sport in all sports. We're really assessing and trying to get an overall view.

BS: How do you feel about where things stand overall so far?

PB: I'm one of these nervous guys who never thinks he's got it
figured out. If you are picturing a blue print we have a few aspects in place.
Everybody that I've talked to really seems gung ho, and Fort Wayne is an easy place to be gung ho about. Everybody
we call, nobody is lukewarm, everybody is red hot to come to Fort Wayne.

BS: How many people are you looking to bring to training camp?

PB: Thirty is probably a pretty safe number, but if you keep
calling and the fax machine keeps working you are always going to get surprised
near the end by somebody new who might show up. That's when camp gets a little
bit better. Everybody is trying to impress everybody at camp, including me,
too. You get one chance to make a good impression, and I want to make sure it's
the best, most organized it can possibly be.

Posted in: Komets


Thu, 07/27/2006 - 12:24pm

Decent interview. I would have liked more info the the player they are talking to but I understand the need to be general about it. The toughness part bothered me a little. It sounds like he's saying there's a fine line and where do you want to cross it. I know poeple say that Bingham has coached tough teams before, but I can't help but wonder after this interview if that will contuine.
I hope he's right by saying everyone will be competing for a job then maybe Reiter might actually sign (if he believes it or not) and as for character references, that may spell the end for Duhart signing. He does have a bad rep going on right now. I still think it a shame if they can't sign him because he is entertaining and he can put the puck in the net.
The affilation still bothers me, but if Bingham's right and they take only the guys that want to move up then what the heck. It's just me, but if I'm a vet and the AHL said hey, come up here for the weekend, a chance to go even higher who knows. That's what bothers me.
Otherwise I can't wait to see how the new season plays out.

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 12:38pm

This is the kind of guy we've been looking for as a coach--- one with a brain and a personality to boot...

I am really getting excited about all of this and can't wait until we start camp. It's interesting that so far the guys signed were the ones "we" (our group) had decided should be resigned.


Thu, 07/27/2006 - 1:17pm

I was going to post this last night....before my DSL died for 14 hours!!! I personally don't have a problem with a possible affilation....but I would like to see it being something that will benefit the Komets as well as the AHL team. If we get a favourable deal, then it is a huge incentive when recruiting the kind of players that all of us want to see here. Blake, how would a players salary be figured against the cap if an AHL team did send us someone for say, a rehab stint or to get more playing/development time? Or would it depend on the players AHL contract?

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 1:20pm


First off, thank heavens you're back. No more vacations and letting the inmates run the asylum.

Second, IMO, Bingham sounds to me like a great guy and a good coach. Balance to me, is a key and critical factor; but he also comes off as extremely passionate. Passion, Balance, Personality. All things Puhalaski didn't exude.

Keep up the good work!

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 2:54pm

Guy coming from the AHL would count against the UHL cap whatever he was making. Greg, of course they aren't going to come right out and tell us whom they are talking to. They don't want other teams to know. As for toughness, he's not going to sign someone who can't play so there won't be any designated fighters. He'd rather have a team where everybody can take care of themselves and stick up for each other.

Komet Warrior
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 3:12pm

Do you think WE will get Robin Big Snake?

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 3:14pm

big snake already signed in canada

Komet Warrior
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 3:26pm

I did not now that. What team is he on MAN?

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 3:28pm

KW, enough with the MAN stuff or I will hurt you. :)

See rule No. 9

Hit Somebody, don't say anything, either. We're all going to play nice and be friends here.

Komet Warrior
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 3:39pm

SOrry about that I forgot that! Do you now what team Big Snake is on Blakes?

Komet Warrior
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 3:45pm


Says he is not on a team yet for season 2006-2007. Does anyone now if he really has a team or if this is a RUMOR?

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 4:01pm

It doesn't really matter if it's true or not because I'm sure Rockford has retained his rights.

Hit Somebody!!!
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 4:02pm

Easy Greasy Blakes Super Fan....loosen up...have fun....Geesh. Grandpa!!!!!

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 4:09pm

You d--- kids stay off of my lawn! Why I oughta...

Tony E
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 4:43pm

Now now Blake...Stress can cause hair loss....ooops perhaps that freighter has already rolled over the hill. ;-)

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 5:21pm

they usually dont update hockeydb until the season actually starts...lets tee-pee blakes house

Thu, 07/27/2006 - 5:54pm

In the decade of the '60's we sent a man to the moon and returned him safely to the Earth;

We have sent roving machines to distant planets to explore them at length;

The technology exists to engrave the entire sum of human knowledge on the head of a pin;

So why can't someone figure out a way to anchor hockey nets so that they don't fly off their moorings at every critical juncture of a game?

Any why can't Fort Wayne Newspapers figure out a way to get me a DRY NEWSPAPER on days when it rains?

Komet Warrior
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 5:59pm

WE should trade for Big Snake. He is a fighter that can score lots of goals!

Hit Somebody!!!
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 6:06pm

He is also a nut-brain....don't sign him...there are better tough guys out there that play much smarter.

Hit Somebody!!!
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 6:53pm

Super Fan...I hope you are in a better mood tonight...Just wanted to comment on your many names. Blakes, Super Fan, Blakester, and now BS? And we all thought you were posting under the name of Komet Warrior when you were gone, too. We are glad you are back and appreciate your information and hard work following the Komet's day to day. You are the biggest fan for a reported I have ever seen...Super Fan....LOL

Hit Somebody!!!
Thu, 07/27/2006 - 6:54pm


Thu, 07/27/2006 - 9:29pm

There are several guys from last year's Rockford team that I would pick over Big Snake. Big Snake almost single handedly handed over the series to the Komets. Infact he should have got our MVP for last season's playoffs. He did the same crap when Rockford played K-zoo in the next round. No Big Snakes, no Dave Stewarts on our team, keep the players that are willing to sacrafice the team's success for their own personal battles on other teams please.

Fri, 07/28/2006 - 3:08am

I always thought that most of his posts were BS, but now I KNOW!!!!!

Fri, 07/28/2006 - 3:09am

LOL Sorry, just kidding!!!

Fri, 07/28/2006 - 4:58am

Anybody see in the USA TODAY that Littlejohn was traded to Quad City?

Fri, 07/28/2006 - 5:55am

I love his opinion on "toughness". Dropping the gloves doesn't necessarily signify someone as tough. Play hungry, aggressive, tough and smart. There's no place for goons on a championship team, IMHO.

Tony E
Fri, 07/28/2006 - 6:08am

Big Snake= cement head
coach= brilliant

Goodbye Winnipeg :-(
Regina here we come!

If I am reading everything right, this roster will probably have 8-10 players who are not UHL retreads. So we will be seeing fresh faces.

Fri, 07/28/2006 - 6:14am

The way the UHL is shaping up, most teams could have that, but Blake could be right and players might be in a wait and see mode and we'll have a lot of signings in late August and early September.

Fri, 07/28/2006 - 6:32am

The J-G (sorry Blake) had it this morning that Littlejohn was traded to Elmira for the rights to players.

Fri, 07/28/2006 - 6:39am

I might have read it backwards in the USA Today, thanks Jeff.