• Twitter
  • Facebook
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Opening Arguments

Weed wacky

Good grief:

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told a constituent in favor of legalizing marijuana that he doesn't support the idea because drugs like pot lead to death.

[. . .]

"Because of the harm that substances like marijuana and other narcotics pose to our society, I have concerns about this legislation. The detrimental effects of drugs have been well documented: short-term memory loss, loss of core motor functions, heightened risk of lung disease, and even death," McConnell wrote.

This won't really aid efforts to persuade kids to be careful about drugs. When they hear such obvious exaggerations about one drug, it makes them more skeptical about drug warnings in general.

Comments

littlejohn
Thu, 03/15/2012 - 12:40pm

One hundred percent of heroin addicts got started with milk.

Christopher Swing
Thu, 03/15/2012 - 12:52pm

And here we actually agree on something, Leo.

But we have to remember, there's money in the War for a War on Drugs, for lobbyists and police unions:

"Some of the groups who want to keep the drug illegal are police unions that want more members to pay more dues. One of the primary sources for cash for more policing activities are Federal grants for penalizing illegal drug use, which help pay for overtime, additional police officers, and equipment for the force. That’s what Lovell does, he gets those grants. He also fights against democratic mechanisms to legalize drugs."

 

"But Republic Report reviewed lobbying contracts during the Prop 19 fight, and found that Lovell’s firm was paid over $386,350 from a wide array of police unions, including the California Police Chiefs Association.

While Lovell may contend that he sincerely opposes the idea of marijuana legalization, he has constructed an entire business model predicated on pot prohibition."

 

"There is big money in marijuana prohibition. Lovell represented a police union in a bid to steer some $2.2 million dollars into a “Marijuana Suppression Program.” In 2009 and 2010, California police unions sought a $7,537,389 chunk of Federal money for police to conduct a “Campaign Against Marijuana Planting” program.

The anti-marijuana money went directly into the paychecks of many officers. For example, police departments in Shasta, Siskiyou, and Tehama Counties formed a “North California Eradication Team” to receive $550,000 in grants that helped pay for overtime, a new officer, and flight operations:

The total amount awarded was $550,000, to be split between Shasta, Siskiyou and Tehama counties, which make up the Northern California Marijuana Eradication Team (NorCal-MET). Broken down in the agenda worksheet, the sheriff’s office is expecting to spend $20,000 on flight operations, $94,895 for the full-time deputy’s salary and benefits, $16,788 for the administration assistant salary and benefits and $29,983 to cover up to 666.29 hours of overtime."

 

http://www.republicreport.org/2012/exclusive-why-cant-you-smoke-pot-because-lobbyists-are-getting-rich-off-of-the-war-on-drugs/

bryanjbrown
Thu, 03/15/2012 - 1:49pm

Isn't sugar as destructive?  Yet how many schools push candy as fundraisers?  And strong drink even more destructive?  Yet it is tolerated, even celebrated, among us? And how about the prescription drugs kids are put on to alter their personalities?   The war on drugs is futlile and funding more bad than good at this point.  

Quantcast