• Twitter
  • Facebook
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Opening Arguments

Crime seen

The videotaping-cops controversy comes to Indiana:

SOUTH BEND — The recent arrest of a University of Notre Dame student for allegedly fighting with police after trying to videotape a crime scene has raised questions about the legality of recording crime events.

Police say it is increasingly common for people to videotape crime scenes, especially as cell phones and pocket-sized camcorders become more popular.

But if doing so interferes with police work, then police will tell them to stop, as they did with Benjamin Ashenburg on Aug. 29.

Glenn Reynolds has been collecting stories nationwide about police who try to stop the taping of their activities. More often than not, the cases involve a pretty clear abuse of power. Police are public employees doing the public's business, so their activities should be open to public scrutiny.

But police actions seem to be more reasonable in this case. The crime was not in public but in a priavte residence where excise police had taken control, and there was a fear that undercover officers could be exposed by the taping. As Hoosier State Press general counsel Steve Key notes in the story, the law recognizes the need for protecting such officers.

But as Key also notes, police sometimes try to prohibit taping because "they know their actions might not look good on film." And the "interfering with a police investigation" charge is too general to always be taken at face value.

Comments

Michaelk42
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 5:23pm

From what I gather what really happened was some people got together, decided the First World Problem of mere *parents* filming their own *children* required fixing, and sold IP rights that weren't clearly theirs to a private company.

Of course, the hassle of little people recording their own children was replaced with the hassle of having a Bodyguard of the Moneyed Class arrest one of those little people for doing something in a public arena that in a free society would be allowed without question.

Speaking of people ruining things for everyone.

tim zank
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 7:14pm

Rut-row..I smell a lib on lib cat fight.

Michaelk42
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 8:59pm

And apparently Tim still only knows one word for "people not like me."

William Larsen
Sat, 09/18/2010 - 10:31pm

Kevin Knuth, you have kids in show choir, please tell me what really happened. I would love to hear it.

"Not what really happened- I had kids in show choir, and guys like you want to ruin it for everyone." How am I doing this?

Kevin Knuth
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 9:02am

William- I cannot tell you how many show choir events I went to over 11 years. I noticed the sign as I walked in that said "no cameras allowed".

Of course, you do not believe the rules apply to you.

how did your lawsuit work out?

William Larsen
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 11:44am

Knuth writes "William- I cannot tell you how many show choir events I went to over 11 years. I noticed the sign as I walked in that said

Michaelk42
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 4:23pm

@Kevin Knuth

A fair point; did the school put up these "no videotaping" signs you claim to have seen, or did the hired videographer do so in order to create a protected market for himself?

"how did your lawsuit work out?"

Wow, before I thought you were asking a genuine question. But I guess you're just trying to be a smug prick. Way to be a Knunt there, Knuth.

tim zank
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 4:41pm

See Michaelk42, I was right, it's a lib on lib catfight! (libertarian larson versus liberal knuth) wowsers!!

Seems to me I do remember reading about the lawsuit after Mr. Larsons altercation, I don't think Kevin was being smug about that, I think he was asking a legitimate question.

Quantcast