• Twitter
  • Facebook
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Opening Arguments

Listen up, maggots

Finally we have it, a kinder, gentler Army:

Hollywood may have to tone down its portrayal of the military's screaming, in-your-face boot camp drill sergeant. In today's Army, shouting is out and a calmer approach to molding young minds is in, says the head of Pentagon personnel. The Army says it has reduced by nearly 7 percent the number of recruits who wash out in the first six to 12 months of military life.

[. . .]

He said the old way was to "talk loud, talk often, get their attention" — shock treatment to teach discipline and mold the newly recruited civilian into a soldier.

But trainers found today's generation responded better to instructors who took "a more counseling" type role, Jones said, using strong tactics when needed but keeping them the exception instead of the rule.

The approach has had two positive results, he said: It has lowered attrition among those who go through training each year and has eased one of the greatest fears of recruits — their fear over whether they can make it through basic training.

Of course it remains to be seen whether the people retained by this policy should really be in the Army. Those "responding better to instructors who take a more counseling type of role" might be facing an enemy that has hardly toned down its approach to war. The role of the military is to stand watch for the rest of us, which means they have to be tougher than us, more devoted to duty, more willing to sacrifice. I'm not sure how we create that kind of warrior culture with an approach that seems designed for college freshmen with self-esteem issues.

That branch of service, by the way, is ditching its "Army  of One" slogan in favor of "Army Strong." Talk about false advertising.

Posted in: Current Affairs

Comments

Jim
Wed, 10/11/2006 - 5:15am

Well, it's an all-volunteer force and the number of people willing to volunteer to be screamed at is dwindling in the midst of a war. What do you do? Back in the days of the draft, we could treat people any way we wanted to -- they had no choice. Today they do. The Army has to change the way it trains people. What worked for the World War II, Korea and Vietnam era doesn't necessarily work today. Today's basic training is actually tougher -- without the screaming -- than it was when I went through in 1983. My answer to people who question what we are doing is to say, "So when are you enlisting -- or encouraging your child to enlist?" Come make us stronger!

Bob G.
Wed, 10/11/2006 - 5:42am

So maybe we should think about conscription again? I'm for that, personally.

Or at least send all these violent gun offenders overseas to shoot people...if they "need" to do that so badly HERE..let them do it where it would do some GOOD.

I'll be honest with you...when in a muddy foxhole being shot AT...you don't want the guy next to you worrying about how his D.I. was "counselling" him when he should have been screaming at him to make him over into what the military NEEDS, namely men (and women) who will act first regarding their country and fellow soldiers...THAT is how you win wars (polticians excluded of course).

Making someone "feel good about themselves" is ONE thing...making them FIGHT to save their lives, and the lives of their comrades in a battle is quite the other. This shouldn't become another "gray area"..it should be black and white, period!

If you look at the youth today, most all of them could use a nice "in your face" approach to respect and self discipline.

Lord knows the schools can't do anything about it any longer...they're not "allowed" to.

B.G.

Jim
Wed, 10/11/2006 - 7:23am

Things will have to get very desperate before this country considers conscription again. We're not fighting a "muddy foxhole" war -- it's a war where brain is just as important as brawn. Again, the number of young men and women volunteering for the "in your face" approach isn't meeting our needs. So where do we go from here?

Bob G.
Wed, 10/11/2006 - 7:32am

Well, molly-coddling, hand holding and diplomacy don't seem to be fairing too well these days overseas....no matter WHO the antagonist is, sir...

So maybe it's time for some "Pattonesque" persuasion?
Or perhaps a return to a little tome by Sun Tzu?

(just my view from the trenches)

Sustineo Alas!

B.G.

Quantcast