Isn't it curious that people pushing the "science" of global warming are mostly anti-technology?
I suppose the only way to have avoided getting ourselves into this whole climate change mess was for us to have never progressed as a civilization in the first place. We could still be hunters and gatherers. Children would probably die at an early age from disease or exposure, but at least the population would not be so burdensome to the Earth.
Global-warming science strikes me as very like intelligent design science. Real science puts itself into the churn of empiric investigation to see if theories can be disproved. It doesn't demand to be accepted on faith.
