So far, it looks as if the experiment to allow cameras into a few Indiana courtrooms is going well. The feared grandstanding by attorneys or witnesses being intimidated hasn't happened -- in fact, people seem more prepared, and there is more civility. Of course, there is a downside or two:
After one of his two televised hearings, Judge Robert R. Altice Jr. watched the proceedings on television and was chagrined to see a shot of himself chewing his Nicorette gum. "That wasn't very nice to see," the ex-smoker said.
One interesting development -- though it should not have been unanticipated -- is that only about 15 percent of defendants have agreed to the cameras. Having public trials is, among other things, a protection for those accused, but there is such a thing as too public. How many of us would like to see official accusations against us paraded on TV or the Internet?
There won't be a real test for this experiment until there is a big trial -- or at least an interesting one -- that is broadcast. I suspect people will get caught up in watching it, but that doesn't really mean they'll get a terrific insight into the justice system. If they do, that's the real value of cameras and recording devises in the courtroom.
