• Twitter
  • Facebook
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Opening Arguments

The ID evidence is in

Suck it up, voter ID opponents:

Voter ID laws do not swing many elections, because people without identification do not represent a large share of registered voters; they are particularly unlikely to vote; and a share of them will vote Republican.

This is from a New York Times writer, someone not guaranteed to be a big fan of Republicans.

ID proponents allege the possibility of widespread fraud, by Democrats, natch, that can steal elections. Opponents say Republicans are engaged in a cynical effort to disenfranchise voters likely to not  have IDs and to be Democrats, the poor, minorities, the elderly, etc. This is a blatantly political argument on both sides, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.

To prevail, ID opponents have to demonstrate large-scale disenfranchisement that can swing elections, and the fact is they can't.  Proponents have to demonstrate specific cases of large-scale fraud that can swing elections, and the fact is they can, lots of them. Say thank you, Sen. Franken!

So hush up and sit down. The science is settled!

Quantcast