Not everyone agrees with my opinion that the Fox News candidate questions did a good job:
It wasn’t that the Fox moderators–mostly Megyn Kelly and Chris Wallace, and to a lesser extent, Brett Baier–asked “tough” questions. I’m all for tough questions. But there’s a difference between “tough” and “snarky,” and I felt there was far more of the latter than the former. Kelly and Wallace in particular spent precious air time framing their questions as ad hominem attacks rather than a quest to probe serious issues.
I hear "tough" Somebody else hears "snarky." Maybe doing a blog for all these years has blurred the difference for me. Consider this a trial run. Just wait till the CNN folks get ahold of the candidates for the next debate.