• Twitter
  • Facebook
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Opening Arguments


Civilization returns to Chicago:

Every schoolchild who’s ever squirmed in his seat, anxious for recess to arrive, can sympathize with students in Chicago. This year, many public schools in that city are scheduled to have recess for the first time in three decades. Chicago’s long recess drought isn’t unusual. Even before No Child Left Behind, recess was an endangered species. Since NCLB, every minute of the school day has been scrutinized for its instructional value—and recess, a break from instruction, often didn’t survive the scrutiny. It was, by definition, a waste of time.

But while administrators were trying to get rid of recess, academics were studying it—that is, they were studying the time when children weren’t studying. The new science of recess says that recess isn’t a waste of time at all. “Having recess is much, much, much better than not having recess,” says Anthony Pellegrini, a professor of educational psychology at the University of Minnesota who’s written extensively on the subject.

"Having recess is much, much better than not having recess." It took a lot of academic study and deep thinking to figure that one out? The secret of life is pace and balance, learning how to mix "productive" time with down time. Depriving that part of a student's education is nothing short of criminal negligence.