• Twitter
  • Facebook
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Opening Arguments

Quiet that canon!

God, this is depressing:

We are calling for an occupation of syllabi in the social sciences and humanities. This call to action was instigated by our experience last semester as students in an upper-division course on classical social theory. Grades were based primarily on multiple-choice quizzes on assigned readings. The course syllabus employed a standardized canon of theory that began with Plato and Aristotle, then jumped to modern philosophers: Hobbes, Locke, Hegel, Marx, Weber and Foucault, all of whom are white men. The syllabus did not include a single woman or person of color.

We have major concerns about social theory courses in which white men are the only authors assigned. These courses pretend that a minuscule fraction of humanity — economically privileged white males from five imperial countries (England, France, Germany, Italy and the United States) — are the only people to produce valid knowledge about the world. This is absurd. The white male syllabus excludes all knowledge produced outside this standardized canon, silencing the perspectives of the other 99 percent of humanity.

The white male canon is not sufficient for theorizing the lives of marginalized people. None of the thinkers we studied in this course had a robust analysis of gender or racial oppression. They did not even engage with the enduring legacies of European colonial expansion, the enslavement of black people and the genocide of indigenous people in the Americas. Mentions of race and gender in the white male canon are at best incomplete and at worst racist and sexist.

The drivel goes on and on and on just like that, but "The white male canon is not sufficient for theorizing the lives of marginalized people" pretty much captures the essence of the piece. It's called "Occupy the syllabus," which tells you all you need to know about these, um, victims.

Damn that Locke! If only he hadn't been a white male, we could have taken his contributions to republicanism and liberal theory seriously, then used them for a Declaration of Independce, which would mean freedom for everybody! Oh, wait.