Janay Rice, victim of husband Ray's knockout punch, is lashing out at the media for "making us relive a moment in our lives that we regret everyday" and for taking "something away from the man that I love." That prompts this question:
A worthy rebuttal from the one person qualified to make it — or an attempt to shift blame?
I'm always open to a good anti-capital punishment argument. As regular readers will know, I'm highly conflicted on the issue, and my opinions have been all over the map. But let's keep the debate honest, OK?
If you're getting tired of the "undocumented wokers" euphemism for illegal immigrants, the LA Times has provided some new ways to obfuscate by mislabeling: (emphasis added)
If you have to walk somewhere in a part of town where there have been a rash of armed robberies, should you not carry a gun because to do so would let the thugs win by knowing they have changed your behavior? That's the convoluted reasoning some "sexual assault prevention advocates" seem seem to have adopted:
Anybody out there still think the Detroit police chief was wrong to urge citizens to arm themselves?
Isn't the first sentence of this Associated Press story just precious?
INDIANAPOLIS - Loretta Rush was formally sworn in Monday as Indiana's first female chief justice, but her gender hardly was mentioned during the ceremony.
Did the Supreme Court already settle the gay marriage issue, way back in 1972?
A whole lot of judges who are being asked to decide whether states may ban same-sex couples from marrying think the Supreme Court clearly gave them the answer last year: no.
Here’s the thing: Stories like this happen all the time.
British Columbia tightened its driving-while-impaired law in 2010 to make a BAC as low as .05 an offense, and they say the results have been significant:
